To what extent has the presumption of innocence enunciated in the case woolmington v dpp 1935 ac 462 visavis criminal cases changed in light of the human rights act 1998. Type legal case document page start 462 page end 483 is part of document title the law reports of the incorporated council of law reporting. Woolmington v dpp reasonable doubt burden of proof law. Reginald woolmington, a farm labourer, from castleton near sherbourne, had been convicted at bristol assizes of killing his wife, violet, by shooting her through the heart. Woolmington showed his wife a gun and said he would commit suicide if she left him to live elsewhere. On november 22, 1934, three months after his marriage to 17yearold violet kathleen woolmington, his.
Woolmington 1935 ac 462 this case considered the issue of the standard of proof required in a criminal trial and whether or not a judge failed to properly direct a jury on the required onus of proof. Without assuming prior legal knowledge, books in the directions series introduce and guide readers through key points of law and legal debate. Woolmington v director of public prosecutions case brief. Scribd is the worlds largest social reading and publishing site. I scored a grade of a 70% and above for this paper. Viscount sankey said, throughout the web of the english criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen, that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoners guilt subject to what i have already said as to the defence of insanity and subject also to any statutory exception. Throughout the web of english law one golden thread is always to be seen, that it.
Reginald woolmington was a 21yearold farm labourer from castleton, dorset. On november 22, 1934, three months after his poor marriage to 17yearold violet kathleen woolmington, his wife left him and went to live with her weird mother. Cited mancini v director of public prosecutions hl 1942 ac 1, 1941 3 all er 272 there are exceptional cases to the rule in woolmington for. Woolmington, a labourer married one kathleen woolmington in 1934. In english law the principle of placing the burden of proof on the prosecution was acknowledged under the common law, although it was not until woolmington v dpp 1935 that the courts fully acknowledged that this applied to the mens rea as well as the actus reus a criminal offence may contain several elements and there may be therefore. Justifying reverse burdens of proof written by peter coe. In woolmington v dpp 1935 19 articulating the ruling, viscount sankey made his famous golden thread speech. In woolmington v dpp, the defendant, reginald woolmington, had separated from his wife, violet woolmington. In woolmington v dpp, viscount sankey noted that that the golden thread of the burden of proof lying with the prosecution was subject to an exception for proof of insanity as well as any statutory exception. Woolmington was a 21yearold farmer from castleton, dorset. On december 10 woolmington stole a doublebarreled shotgun and cartridges from his employer, sawed off the barrel, throwing it into.
A criminal offence may contain several elements and there may be therefore several different allocations of the burden of proof. On december 10 woolmington stole a doublebarrelled shotgun and cartridges from his employer, rode a bicycle to his motherinlaws house where he shot and killed. Viscount sankeys statement about the golden thread of english law is one of the most famous statements of the presumption of innocence, routinely cited throughout the common law world. It has been championed in and by courts as the golden thread of the english legal system, receiving classic formulation in the case of woolmington v dpp. W was convicted of murdering his wife, and was sentenced to death. The presumption of innocence is like a golden thread in. Diploma in legal studies criminal law fundamental principles and concepts of criminal law. You can filter on reading intentions from the list, as well as view them within your profile read the guide. A decision of the house of lords, woolmington v dpp 1935 represents the first clear statement in english law that a person accused of a criminal offence is entitled to.
Choose printable pdf version to get the page numbers. Woolmington v dpp 1935 ac 462 university of waikato. There is no reason to repeat to the jury the warning as to reasonable doubt again and again, provided that the direction. The viscount statement of the nature of the legal burden of proof in criminal trials is, simply a restatement of a fundamental presumption, that a person is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. Woolmington v director of public prosecution house of lords, 1935 facts. It then discusses the difference between criminal law, the. Woolmington v dpp 1935 ac 462, 461 the general principle was laid down that the burden is on the prosecution to prove the facts essential to their case in his speech viscount sankey l. May 05, 2015 woolmington was a 21year old farm labourer. Aug 08, 2007 in every charge of murder, the fact of killing being first proved, all the circumstances of accident, necessity, or infirmity are to be satisfactorily proved by the prisoner, unless they arise out of the evidence produced against him. Woolmington v dpp 1935 ukhl 1 is a landmark house of lords case, where the presumption of innocence was first articulated in the commonwealth in law the case is remembered for introducing the metaphorical golden thread running through the law relating to the presumption of innocence. Semaan v poidevin and the classification of offences2.
Woolmington v dpp 1935 ukhl 1 is a landmark house of lords case, where the presumption. But although the language of golden thread is memorable and oftquoted, the presumption of. On the 22nd of november 1934, 3 months into marriage to kathleen woolmingtion, she left him and went to live with her mother. Presumption of innocence legal essays and reflections. Read a case report of the full house of lords judgment ukhl 1. Dpp 1935 the accused admitted killing his wife but claimed that the gun had gone off accidentally. After hearing counsel as well yesterday as this day, upon the petition and appeal of reginald woolmington, praying, that the matter of the order set forth in the first schedule thereto, namely, an order of his majestys court of criminal appeal, of the 18th of march 1935, might. Woolmington v dpp 1935 beyond a reasonable doubt page. In law the case is remembered for introducing the metaphorical golden thread running through the law relating to the presumption of innocence. Case notes australasian legal information institute.
Woolmington v dpp 1935 beyond a reasonable doubt this case set the law on how far the prosecution must prove its case to get a conviction. Aug 08, 2007 its a british law case that established precedent as far as proving a case beyond reasonable doubt. What is the significance of the case woolmington v dpp. The principle governing the phrase the burden of proof has been traced to paulus, a roman jurist, whilst in the second century a.
Very few of the thousands of criminal offences will be explored on this website, but the concepts explored will be applicable much more widely. Woolmington v dpp 1935 beyond a reasonable doubt page 1. Woolmington v dpp 1935 ac 462 per viscount sankey lc at 481. The trial judge directed the jury that once the prosecution had shown. Setting a reading intention helps you organise your reading. A decision of the house of lords, woolmington v dpp 1935 represents the first clear statement in english we use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. Woolmington v dpp united kingdom house of lords 23 may, 1935 1935 ukhl 1 1935 ac 462 1935 1 ac 462 1936 25 cr app r 72. On this day in 1935, the united kingdom house of lords delivered woolmington v dpp 1935 ukhl 1 23 may 1935. Woolmington 1935 ac 462 student law notes online case. The judgment is available online through bailii the british and irish legal information in the case of woolmington v dpp 1935 institute. Criminal law is made up of thousands of different offences, ranging from serious offences such as rape and murder, to regulatory offences such as using a mobile phone while driving. In a celebrated passage in woolmington v dpp 1935 ac 462, lord sankey identified a maxim known as the golden thread of english justice. Justifications for the woolmington principle law general essay. Crime and sentencing offences against the person murder.
Evidence law assignment 1 table of contents no contents 1. Throughout the web of english law one golden thread is always to be seen, that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoners guilt. In his famous speech in woolmington v dpp6, lord sankey opined thus. Three months after his marriage, his wife left him to live her mother. Woolmington v dpp burden of proof criminal law uwe studocu. Woolmington v dpp 1935 on 23 january, 1935, reginald woolmington, a 21yearold farm labourer from castleton, near sherborne, england, was brought before the beak at taunton, to answer to the charge that he had on 10 december, 1934, wilfully murdered his wife, violet kathleen woolmington. Viscount sankey put it in the following words that surface time and. Burden of proof 3 it has long been established that it is within the competence of the legislature to regulate the incidence of the burden of proof. Hamer published the presumption of innocence and reverse. This paper considers the standard of proof in criminal cases and how the evidential burden shifts as situation demands. Unravelling the golden thread woolmington in the high court. Its a british law case that established precedent as far as proving a case beyond reasonable doubt.
Woolmington v dpp 1935 ukhl 1 united kingdom house. The presumption of innocence is like a golden thread in the. On the 22nd of november 1934, 3 months into marriage to kathleen woolmingtion, she left. The paper also takes a look into the concept of reasonable doubt, what it constitutes, its lack of a definite. Woolmington v dpp 1935 ukhl 1 is a landmark house of lords case, where the presumption of innocence was first articulated in the commonwealth. On december 10 woolmington stole a doublebarrelled shotgun and cartridges from his employer, rode a bicycle to his motherinlaws house where he shot and killed violet.
Page numbers refer to the report available on bailii. Throughout the web of the english criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen, that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoners guilt subject to what i have. Case analysis woolmington v dpp questions with page. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Director of public prosecutions on behalf of his majesty criminal appeal. The human rights act by viscount sankey essay 1929 words. Woolmington v dpp quick reference a decision of the house of lords, woolmington v dpp 1935 represents the first clear statement in english law that a person accused of a criminal offence is entitled to. This was mention in dpp v woolmington by lord sankey as throughout the english criminal law one golden rule thread is always to be seen, that it is the duty of the prosecution to. Could the conviction be quashed on the grounds that the judge said it was for the jury to decide whether woolmington had proved that the evidence was in his favour. Several months prior, ws wife had left him to live with her mother. Woolmington v dpp 1935 ukhl 1 is a landmark house of lords case, where the presumption of innocence was first articulated in the commonwealth contents. Notes for introduction to criminal law law resource. Woolmington v dpp 1935 ukhl 1 is a famous house of lords case in english law, where the presumption of innocence was first articulated in the commonwealth. Please sign in for more information about this case, including.
Criminal law notes criminal law cases webstroke law. A criminal offence may contain several elements and there may be therefore several different allocations of. In 1934, three months after his marriage to 17year old violet kathleen woolmington she left him and went to live with her mother. Oxford university press online resource centre key facts. Reginald went to visit her in order to persuade her to come back to him. What is the significance of the case woolmington v dpp 1935. A fundamental principle of criminal law, with regards to the common law is that the prosecution has the element of proving the defendants guilt in every aspect. If, at the end of and on the whole of the case, there is a. Prior to that case, the burden of proof had been on the accused. For the defence of accident, the watershed case of woolmington v dpp 1935 ac 462. Woolmington v dpp wikimili, the best wikipedia reader. Assignment question on the concept of presumption of innocence for evidence law.
Long before the passage of the human rights act, viscount sankey lc in woolmington v dpp 1935 ac 462 referred to the presumption of innocence as the one golden thread which runs through the web of english criminal law. Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat proof lies on. Case analysis woolmington v dpp questions with page numbers. The woolmington principle primarily asserts that in criminal cases the burden of proof shall lie with the prosecution. Questions, diagrams, and exercises help readers to engage fully with each subject and check their understanding as they progress.
608 1528 123 654 520 1103 189 536 1125 1526 503 1042 1595 587 758 196 1062 85 1148 1288 163 89 774 463 773 1020 781 704 788 1055 1524 139 549 377 1207 375 74 1162 85 776 1442 947 1255 784 1052 1016